> If my technology is used for evil, I am responsible. So, by that logic, Tatu Ylönen should be held responsible for all hacks/crimes committed via ssh? You c

> If my technology is used for evil, I am responsible. So, by that logic, Tatu Ylönen should be held responsible for all hacks/crimes committed via ssh? You can't blame someone for making a tool that someone else uses for evil. Should Ford be responsible for all auto-related deaths? Should Edison be responsible for all deaths where the state put someone to death via electrocution? Should Jobs be responsible because a hacker used an OSX machine to hack into another machine? I don't get this line of thinking, although I understand the sentiment.