3 ms·
> AFAIK it's not possible to distribute internal DoH servers via DHCP Back in the days we used to call this DHCP option 6, i.e. DNS. I'm not sure why you want
by josteink 8y ago
> AFAIK it's not possible to distribute internal DoH servers via DHCP
Back in the days we used to call this DHCP option 6, i.e. DNS.
I'm not sure why you want to replace a DHCP provided DNS server with a DHCP provided DoH server.
Because why on earth would the DHCP-server provide different DNS-servers for those two use-cases? The idea itself makes no sense.
Can we please just get back to regular DNS, please? It works. It scales.
It's possibly the single last thing on the internet which is still decentralized, and I'd hate to see this become another centralized, single point of failure, walled-garden bullshit.
- isostatic 8y agoI assume you agree on the need for securing DNS (DNS over TLS for example). Just watched a UKNOF presentation on DNS changes. Sounds like google/mozilla were fed up with the sluggishness of standards bodies, network operators, and OSes in securing DNS, so have gone for their own version. Charitably I'd like to think that this is a wakeup call from Mozilla, "sort out your shit or this is the future, but with google owning it"