2 ms·
Regulation isn't the same thing as prohibition. Biometric sign-in wouldn't be covered by their suggestions. This is probably because biometric sign-in is not in
by zamalek 8y ago
Regulation isn't the same thing as prohibition. Biometric sign-in wouldn't be covered by their suggestions. This is probably because biometric sign-in is not inherently abuse of AI/ML. It certainly can be though, but covering that would require prohibiting AI/ML in its entirety, even at home or in academia.
- SlowRobotAhead 8y ago>Regulation isn't the same thing as prohibition True, but it’s almost always the first step in prohibition. Which isn’t to say I think prohibition possible in this case. Just that asking for government involvement is at very best a double edged sword. As far as I know, the Azure Facial Recogition API goes well beyond signing in to things.
- geephroh 8y agoI would recommend reading Oren Etzioni's piece in this month's Communications of the ACM, "Should AI Technology Be Regulated?: Yes, and Here's How."[1] He lays out some very specific, practical ways that regulation can work, while minimizing impacts on innovation. [1] https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232893-point-should-ai-technology-be-regulated/fulltext https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232893-point-should-a...