3 ms·
That has nothing to do with the substance of my argument. Your suggestion is just to walk into it without trying anything? The “bad people” will have access to
by nuguy 8y ago
That has nothing to do with the substance of my argument. Your suggestion is just to walk into it without trying anything? The “bad people” will have access to AI regardless of who creates it, when they create it or what manner they create it in.
- trashtester 8y agoIf your primary concern is just job loss, my reply does not address it. Also, I don't really share your concern, or at least the strength that you seem to hold it with. My concern is with superintelligence. A hostile superintelligence would probably end humanity, or at least the part of it that I care about. Basically I share Elon Musk's view on this. I think superintelligence is quite likely within a few decades or at least a century or two, and if/when it happens, our only hope is that is imbued with values we share. Ideally, the first organizations to discover how to do this should be open or under the control of democratic governments, or secondarily, under the control of corporations that can be regulated by such governments.
- nuguy 8y agoDon’t you see the logic of what I’m saying? How can you read my comment history and still think that automation is not a problem? But the answer is the same for automation and super-intelligence: you have to prevent it from existing in the first place. People who advocate for containment of SI usually prefer prevention but think it’s too difficult and go to containment as a last resort, including Elon musk. Fight as hard as you can for prevention.