3 ms·
They're quite practical even if you don't care about tracking. I have different containers for my work and personal Google accounts and they make things much ea
by daveFNbuck 8y ago
They're quite practical even if you don't care about tracking. I have different containers for my work and personal Google accounts and they make things much easier than relying on Google's support for multiple accounts.
They're also great for development. I have different containers for each user I use while working on logged-in flows. I can just go from tab to tab to test different user experiences or switch between users in a multi-user interaction.
- fernandotakai 8y agothe only thing i miss from containers is a shortcut to open a new tab using current container[0]. it would make usage a lot easier. [0] https://github.com/mozilla/multi-account-containers/issues/462 https://github.com/mozilla/multi-account-containers/issues/4...
- daveFNbuck 8y agoThat would be nice. I'd also like the to be able to automatically revert to default container when leaving a site (like the FB container plugin does), to view/manage cookies by container, and to specify more than one container that I like to open sites in so it doesn't bug me about using my default Google container when I open gmail in my work container.
- dspillett 8y agoThis is one of the things I used to like IE for - perhaps the only thing it got better than the competition: File | New Session ... and then you have a fresh session context that doesn't share cookies with the others so you can log into services as different users. As a developer this is very handy for testing multi-user workflows, and had numerous uses as a more general user too, and it was easy to do ad-hoc without needing to setup multiple profiles first. It didn't work for apps that are sensitive to permanent cookies (and other client-side storage) instead if session level options of course, where multiple profiles does (as presumably does Firefoxes containers? - I don't know as I've not yet used them).
- ric2b 8y agoThat sounds more like incognito mode, no? Containers keep the cookies and other data, yes, so you don't need to re-login every time you start the browser.
- philsnow 8y agoI don't know how edge does incognito but in other browsers, incognito kills the tab history, so if you accidentally close a tab you can't trivially restore it with ctrl+shift+t or whatever.
- wungsten 8y agoThis is the case in Chrome but not in Firefox (private mode)
- dspillett 8y ago> That sounds more like incognito mode, no? Yes, but you can have as many active sessions as you need instead of just two. Incognito/InPrivate/whet-ever-other-browsers-call-the-feature tabs/windows share the same session so that gives you at most two active sessions: normal and incognito. The "new session" option in IE can have many more. For a lot of workflows two is enough, but sometimes I want something like "a couple of distinct base users, a manager, and an admin" for testing more complex user workflows.
- daveFNbuck 8y agoThat does sound useful. I often end up creating several temporary containers while doing testing and development. The overhead of creating and deleting these is annoying.
- M2Ys4U 8y agoAbsolutely! I use them so I can be logged in to multiple AWS accounts at the same time - works like a charm!
- daveFNbuck 8y agoThat's one of my use cases too. It works pretty well when you're actively using multiple accounts. Amazon doesn't preserve the session very long, so I find that most of the time I open one of my AWS containers they're logged out.
- pookeh 8y agoI use this extension called SessionBox on Chrome to do exactly this. It gives me different sessions side by side in the same window.