I didnt think I would comment on the second part, but it is really bugging me. Sorry for the double post. Distributing sexted images that were meant for you is

I didnt think I would comment on the second part, but it is really bugging me. Sorry for the double post. Distributing sexted images that were meant for you is something I would consider to be wrong. Do you disagree with that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenge_porn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenge_porn It seems to be also illegal in the US? Is there an assumption of consent for replication given during the transmitting in your cultural sphere? I never assumed there was that big of a difference in something I consider one of the most basic degrees of morality. Not just as a society, but also as the names states "hackers". In Germany we have the CCC, the chaos communication club (you might know the chaos communication congress). Their mission statement is the hacker ethic https://www.ccc.de/en/hackerethik https://www.ccc.de/en/hackerethik >Make public data available, protect private data. >To protect the privacy of the individual and to strengthen the freedom of the information which concern the public the yet last point was added. It was best summarized by one of the CCC speakers on the topic of "Celebgate". It was across the lines of "ofcourse you can look at it, but then you're just an asshole" Intimate pictures of another person are private data and should only be accessible to people the person consented to. edit: Ok the definition on wikipedia actually differs with the translation >The term is also often misused to describe non 'revenge' scenarios, including nonconsensual pornography distributed by hackers or by individuals seeking profit or notoriety. Well thats dark > German High Court made a May 2014 ruling that intimate photographs of partners should be deleted if the partner so requests.[112]