4 ms·
>"Since 2000 many new satellite measurements were done and the values improved." The point is that "suddenly" people started measuring a higher baryon density
by nonbel 8y ago
>"Since 2000 many new satellite measurements were done and the values improved."
The point is that "suddenly" people started measuring a higher baryon density to make it fit what was required for lambda-CDM model to fit the CMB measurements. Ie, the lambda-CDM model did not pre-dict the spectrum beforehand, they had to tune it to match the data.
And see how the squares and triangles start moving upwards once the blue circles appear: http://www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/BBNLCDMMOND.jpg http://www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/BBNLCDMMOND.jpg
Remember the oil drop experiment mentioned by Feynman in his cargo cult science talk? That is what this looks like to Mcgaugh: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm
I have to say, it is very frustrating to discuss this since you seem to misunderstand every simple point being made, and before that has been corrected you have gone on to miss another point that needs to be addressed. We are not discussing this at a very deep level... Perhaps English is not your native language, but I am just letting you know. I hope no offense is taken.
- acqq 8y ago> The point is that "suddenly" people started measuring a higher baryon density to make it fit what was required W...what? Do you really believe that different scientific organizations in different countries around the world financed and sent different satellites into space but misrepresented the actually measured values only to "fit" some old theoretical predictions? Really? Then there's really no point discussing anything about science with you.
- nonbel 8y agoThere's no point to you discussing science with scientists then. Because that is exactly what scientists are worried about. Why? Because it happens all the time.