If you dig through that list to the articles that are actual journalism (as opposed to explicitly labeled opinion and commentary articles), the last 3 are: - "

If you dig through that list to the articles that are actual journalism (as opposed to explicitly labeled opinion and commentary articles), the last 3 are: - "Facebook Used People’s Data to Favor Certain Partners and Punish Rivals, Documents Show" [0] - "A Hot Seat for Facebook, an Empty Chair for Zuckerberg and a Vow to Share Secret Files" [1] - "On Thanksgiving Eve, Facebook Acknowledges Details of Times Investigation" [2] All three strike me as substantive. Yes, the NYT opinion section is a bit fluffy, and yes, that strikes me as a problem in a world where folks are increasingly unable to distinguish between journalism and editorial, but at the end of the day commentary like that is what the "opinion" label is for. [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/05/technology/facebook-documents-uk-parliament.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/05/technology/facebook-docum... [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/27/technology/facebook-british-hearing-mark-zuckerberg-no-show.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/27/technology/facebook-briti... [2] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/22/business/on-thanksgiving-eve-facebook-acknowledges-details-of-times-investigation.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/22/business/on-thanksgiving-...