4 ms·

You have no reason to believe this. From: https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a25422366/trump-ambassador-to-canada-climate-change-scientists/ https://www.esq

You have no reason to believe this. From: https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a25422366/trump-ambassador-to-canada-climate-change-scientists/ https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a25422366/trump-ambass... "The fourth and latest National Climate Assessment put together by 300 scientists from 13 agencies of the U.S. government and released last month found that climate change is real, man-made, and will cost the U.S. 10 percent of its economy by 2100. Midwestern farmers will lose 75 percent of their crop yields, and trillions of dollars in coastal real estate will be at risk. The wildfires out west, already unprecedented in their destruction, will get worse. Hurricanes and typhoons will grow more ferocious. Epidemic diseases will flourish." And that's just for the US. Large portions of Africa and the Middle East are predicted to become uninhabitable. The threat to human life on a time-scale of 100 years or more is gargantuan.

drorh 8y ago
Wow, by 2100 it will cost the US 10% of its economy? You mean a small size recession? And you all are such a fuss about? And for that you want to deprive 3rd world people from gaining the same benefits you get from energy? This is alarmism on the grandest scale and a horrifying hypocritical at that. There is nothing we can do about CO2 right now. We can just continue to work on safer and cleaner ways to generate electricity (atomic mainly, fusion hopefully, solar for the local homes, etc.)
- Comevius 8y ago
  Alarmism was never so appropriate. We have so much to lose.
- Brakenshire 8y ago
  The predicted costs of tackling it are significantly lower, so why not just tackle it and avoid the recession. Also, a permanent loss of 10% is not a small recession, most recessions lead to no permanent loss, just a demand shock which is made up afterwards. A permanent loss of 10% is more like the financial crisis, and I’d rather avoid that if I can. One brought Trump and Brexit, I’d rather not add another to the mix.
randyrand 8y ago
"Midwestern farmers will lose 75 percent of their crop yields" and other farmers will benefit and have increased yeilds. I don't mind facts. But misleading ones I do mind.
- Oletros 8y ago
  Misleading?

drorh 8y ago

Wow, by 2100 it will cost the US 10% of its economy? You mean a small size recession? And you all are such a fuss about? And for that you want to deprive 3rd world people from gaining the same benefits you get from energy? This is alarmism on the grandest scale and a horrifying hypocritical at that. There is nothing we can do about CO2 right now. We can just continue to work on safer and cleaner ways to generate electricity (atomic mainly, fusion hopefully, solar for the local homes, etc.)

Comevius 8y ago
Alarmism was never so appropriate. We have so much to lose.
Brakenshire 8y ago
The predicted costs of tackling it are significantly lower, so why not just tackle it and avoid the recession. Also, a permanent loss of 10% is not a small recession, most recessions lead to no permanent loss, just a demand shock which is made up afterwards. A permanent loss of 10% is more like the financial crisis, and I’d rather avoid that if I can. One brought Trump and Brexit, I’d rather not add another to the mix.

randyrand 8y ago

"Midwestern farmers will lose 75 percent of their crop yields" and other farmers will benefit and have increased yeilds. I don't mind facts. But misleading ones I do mind.

Oletros 8y ago
Misleading?