> nice way to land into the left stereotype that the poster identified Sorry, but that post did completely ignore that racism exists, and it made the social-le

> nice way to land into the left stereotype that the poster identified Sorry, but that post did completely ignore that racism exists, and it made the social-left out to be people who are mad about others who don't "talk about systemic racism all the time", which is outrageous. If you re-read that comment, you'll see that they did ignore the racism that occurs, and focused on the idea that social-left people are just complaining about stupid things. > Both sides can easily believe racism exists but have pretty wide gaps on how it should be addressed. Agreed, and that's not what I was talking about. The comment made social-left people out as caring about stupid details like "YOU MUST TALK ABOUT RACISM FREQUENTLY" instead of caring about things like actual racism > Stanford choosing black students over equally (or even more qualified) Asian students I'd like to say that while we disagree about how to "fix racism", this is a perfect point. You aren't picking white people like most people do, you're picking Asian students, who make the highest scores of all demographics. > leaves a lot of pressure on black students to prove they are there for the right reasons Talk about hitting the nail on the head! This is a serious problem. I totally agree. We have different ideas of how to solve the problem, but we can both agree that this sucks.