> Haskell and OCaml as implementation languages would signal huge academic bias Apparently reading papers from the past 30 years is a "huge academic bias." I'

> Haskell and OCaml as implementation languages would signal huge academic bias Apparently reading papers from the past 30 years is a "huge academic bias." I'd honestly be fine if it was implemented in Racket too. > inability to come up with a usable language or at least there exists a negative correlation with those languages. No one has ever actually offered me a substantive argument that Haskell is unusable. It always seems to be "well, I don't personally understand it, and that means it's unusable" Uhh okay.