3 ms·
Ugh. It's not by default "illegal", unless it provably violates Part 15. Has a Part 15 assessment been done yet? Have we analyzed power emission levels to asse
by crankylinuxuser 8y ago
Ugh. It's not by default "illegal", unless it provably violates Part 15.
Has a Part 15 assessment been done yet? Have we analyzed power emission levels to assert that this thing is indeed 'breaking the law'?
Has this device been checked by the FCC for spurious emissions during normal operation? Did it pass, or is it chinese jank uncertifiable garbage?
Edit: C'mon downvoters. If you make a claim that it's "Illegal", you need to have some sort of proof that its the case. And I'm not immediately seeing it. Further research? Sure.
- wglb 8y agoThis is mostly correct, except for FCC exceptions for stuff you build yourself. For example, it is legal to broadcast on the FM band if your signal meets certain signal strength criteria. Also, the FCC itself doesn't do assessments, they are done by independent (expensive) labs. But the rest of what you say is correct.
- walshemj 8y agoIf it breaches the power limits I think it is illegal - same as if you used a high power wifi access point with a high gain antenna.