3 ms·
It has to be under suspicion of a crime that attracts over 3 years jail (which is almost anything). They mentioned oversight of a "retired judge" and a "techno
by brokenmachine 8y ago
It has to be under suspicion of a crime that attracts over 3 years jail (which is almost anything).
They mentioned oversight of a "retired judge" and a "technology expert" in the autoplay video at the bottom of https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/security/inprinciple-deal-struck-on-controversial-encryption-bill/news-story/75492c0ee5a389a0ada7955733529af4 https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/security/inprincip...
- mcv 8y agoWhy a retired judge and not an active judge? Presumably because an active is required to obey certain standards and is legally independent. A retired judge is effective just some guy.
- cyphar 8y agoBecause they didn't want judicial oversight. It's just going to be rubber-stamp faux-arbitration.