4 ms·
From what I remember fastmail has always cooperated with law enforcement. It is not zero-knowledge so they always had access to the user data already. Their pr
by climb_stealth 8y ago
From what I remember fastmail has always cooperated with law enforcement. It is not zero-knowledge so they always had access to the user data already.
Their promise has been to not use it for advertising purposes or share it with third parties. I don't see much changing here, but I would like to know if it is.
- krautjakob 8y agoThe Australian state now behaves exactly like an enemy of the people would. In the same way I would not use an e-mail provider in Iran, North Korea, the US or other facist regimes I will now also not use an Australian e-mail provider.
- brongondwana 8y agoYep, we already blogged about this. It's shit legislation, but it is unlikely to affect our customers at all. Public perception on the other hand, it's going to hurt that plenty. Like basically all of Australian tech right now, we're super disappointed in our politicians and their games. I spoke to a couple of senators' offices today, and they were sure it would die in amendment hell. Genius.
- guitarbill 8y agoEmail is already insecure. Even if you use GPG, that's client side, and should be as safe/unsafe as it was before this law (unsafe b/c metadata or unknown vuln). So in terms of threat model, it hasn't changed much. I'm not defending the Oz gov or companies here, but knee-jerk reactions just open you up to more mistakes. For me, the situation is still preferable to Google having my data/metadata.