4 ms·
> That is widely agree upon largely due to Iran's shipment of weapons and financing of external militant groups actively engaged in various conflicts. Where is
by Down_n_Out 8y ago
> That is widely agree upon largely due to Iran's shipment of weapons and financing of external militant groups actively engaged in various conflicts.
Where is your proof on this? Where is all of the proof on any of the things claimed about Iran? Just like there were mass destructive weapons in Irak?? Sure, we know how that turned out. It's time for big ol' USA to just stop meddling in affairs it has no business in. They just want to get their hands on all the oil in the world so they can play the boss, and it most likely is not going to stop there either, next it's water, the market, and so on. The USA is just a big bully, it's their way or not at all. And Europe is like the bully's accomplice, too scared to stand up so just joins along in the bullying. Pathetic, more more more, it's always more they want. Protecting the peace, ha, joke. And while we are at it, let's forgive Saudi Arabia for obviously brutally murdering a journalist, afterall, they just invested millions on some of our weapons.
Farce.
- austincheney 8y agoIf you were really interested in evidence I am sure you wouldn't have any trouble finding it yourself.
- Down_n_Out 8y agoI'm asking evidence of people claiming things without any proof. And yes, I can find my own evidence, hence my question. How is your comment any relevant?
- austincheney 8y agoThen just say you disagree.
- htpttoe18 8y ago> Where is your proof on this? Not proof but it seems an academic exercise. How would they not ally with some enemies of their enemy? With their neighbors invaded, arms and support for rebel groups and threats, constantly pouring in from the other side of the planet, how could they stay out of trouble and not develop weapon systems and allies? There's no carrot for these supposedly crazed nations, well Libya was approached and disarmed...
- torstenvl 8y agoThe evidence exists if you care to look. Most of it is in the way of first-hand accounts, however. Seeing as how this particular forum lacks a subpoena power over defected Shi'ite militia members, I have no way of directly presenting you the evidence. Indirectly, however, you'll find the Internet is pretty replete. You can start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terro... Given the strident tone of your post, I suspect you'll dismiss those sources. No doubt you'll suspect them of being self-serving. Very well. Evidence of Iran's doings also exists in forms which cut against the U.S. military's interest, such as the fact that they duped the U.S. military into violating U.S. law by providing them weapons. https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Is-the-US-supporting-Iranian-backed-militias-in-Iraq-514353 https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Is-the-US-supporting-Irani... https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/indepth/2017/9/4/how-iraqi-militias-got-hold-of-american-tanks https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/indepth/2017/9/4/how-iraqi... https://abcnews.go.com/International/dirty-brigades-us-trained-iraqi-forces-investigated-war/story?id=29193253 https://abcnews.go.com/International/dirty-brigades-us-train... The fact is that Iranian-sponsored terrorism is so prevalent in the Middle East, particularly in Iraq, that just defeating Daesh is a moral problem... it's become a logistical nightmare to not only perform Leahy vetting but to actually carry out operations without a Shi'ite militia taking part and committing atrocities in the name of the Coalition. And those Shi'ite militias? "All are directly backed by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps and are notorious among the Sunni minority population for carrying out extrajudicial killings, torture and ethnic cleansing." https://www.thedailybeast.com/iraqs-shia-militias-accused-of-war-crimes-in-fight-against-isis https://www.thedailybeast.com/iraqs-shia-militias-accused-of... ---------- You are entitled to your opinion that the "USA is just a big bully," although I personally don't think it's a well-founded opinion. However, the next time you feel inclined to start calling things a "farce" before you've examined any evidence, I'd encourage you to reconsider.
- kaveh_h 8y agoAnd you think it’s just of US to sell weapons to a authoritarian murderous regime like SA? Previously Saddam in Iraq? And also the Afghan fundamentalists during Russian and Afghanistan war? Eventually US went to war with both Iraq and Afghanistan with the same leadership they supported earlier. The Shia militias your talking about is no better nor worse than the kind of people both US and SA and other gulf countries have supported in the region. You think ISIS could have existed without certain external help in the ME? The question is not if Iran is bad they clearly are, but they are not worse than the rest of the regional powers also not worse compared to US given it’s track record in both supporting totalitarian leaders and fundamentalists.