3 ms·

Your response shows a good example of not interpreting the strongest, or possibly the only intent, of the message. Your explanation is flawed because it’s deri

Your response shows a good example of not interpreting the strongest, or possibly the only intent, of the message. Your explanation is flawed because it’s derived from how you think of the speaker with no good faith.

DenisM 8y ago
Indeed I don't believe the speaker was asking in good faith. This is why I did not engage them directly, and only opined when the matter of downvotes came up - an explanation of the downvotes may prove helpful.
- v-yadli 8y ago
  If you insist calling it an explanation, I’d call it smear.