The paper makes citations for these claims. For example: "Modern reworkings of the Aristotelian hierarchy give primacy to sight followed by hearing, touch, and

The paper makes citations for these claims. For example: "Modern reworkings of the Aristotelian hierarchy give primacy to sight followed by hearing, touch, and then taste and smell (20, 21). Regardless of the precise characterization, the distal senses of vision and audition are privileged at the expense of the lowly proximal senses of touch, taste, and smell (22)." The relevant citations are: [20] Viberg Å (1984) The verbs of perception: A typological study. Explanations for Language Universals, eds Butterworth B, Comrie B, Dahl Ö (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin), pp 123–162. http://www.pnas.org/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=%C3%85+Viberg&title=The+verbs+of+perception:+A+typological+study&publication_year=1984&pages=123-162 http://www.pnas.org/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlesc... [21] San Roque L, et al. (2015) Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cogn Linguist 26:31–60. http://www.pnas.org/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&author[0]=L+San%20Roque&title=Vision+verbs+dominate+in+conversation+across+cultures,+but+the+ranking+of+non-visual+verbs+varies&publication_year=2015&journal=Cogn+Linguist&volume=26&pages=31-60 http://www.pnas.org/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlesc... [22] Howes D (2005) Empire of the Senses (Berg, Oxford). http://www.pnas.org/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlescholar&gs_type=article&q_txt=(2005)+Empire+of+the+Senses+(Berg%2C+Oxford) http://www.pnas.org/lookup/google-scholar?link_type=googlesc....