4 ms·
The title is provocative and not indicative of the article as a whole. I think this line from the article is a much better summary of the author's point, "Thi
by Junk_Collector 8y ago
The title is provocative and not indicative of the article as a whole. I think this line from the article is a much better summary of the author's point,
"This is not about doing something that’s unethical, illegal or immoral. This is about ensuring that we collectively can defend the values for which we stand. I have a hard time with companies that are working very hard to engage in the market inside China then don’t want to work with the U.S. military."
- code_beers 8y agoThat’s such a red herring argument, and based solely on current headlines about Google. And Project Dragonfly is generating PLENTY of protest of its own.
- Junk_Collector 8y agoThe article is an opinion piece specifically about Google's decision to pull support from DoD projects while choosing to engage in other projects within China. Of course they talk about Project Dragonfly and they also talk about Google's new AI China center and China's "civil-military fusion" strategy.
- code_beers 8y agoInteresting, thank you for the details.