Is it misuse, or does it serve their ultimate purpose, which is to act in the best interest of their constituents? You could easily take the stance that parliam

Is it misuse, or does it serve their ultimate purpose, which is to act in the best interest of their constituents? You could easily take the stance that parliament was being generous to give fb the opportunity to become part of the dialog beforehand (provide that context that was supposedly lacking), and that zuck was foolish to turn them down.