> you close the dialog with that person that allows you to change opinions and outcomes. So if we're nicer to facebook, maybe it'll decide to not spy on people

> you close the dialog with that person that allows you to change opinions and outcomes. So if we're nicer to facebook, maybe it'll decide to not spy on people quite so much, undo the engineered-for-addiction notifications and feed, and curb it's anti-competitive practices (but not give back any market advantage it has already gained through them, of course)? The executives will voluntarily decide to make the company earn less money, so they can be more ethical? Is there any precedent for a large corporation acting in this way?