3 ms·
Gradient descent is done in batches and over the aggregate collection of the training data so it's pretty lossy. Usually the error is more of the fault of the l
by Hydraulix989 8y ago
Gradient descent is done in batches and over the aggregate collection of the training data so it's pretty lossy. Usually the error is more of the fault of the learned model itself, and then the culprit is attributed to neuron "mis"-activations post-hoc. Often, problems take the form of generalization error instead. And yes, all of these problems are still quite unsolved, which is why we don't have end-to-end neural network-based self-driving cars, we just have rule based systems with a perception framework that just uses convnets for vision.
- ghaff 8y agoI think there's this popular perception that you just stream in lots of data from road vehicles and the driving just gets better over time--rather than continuing to discover individual edge cases more or less manually and updating rules based on those.