4 ms·
I did not read the article to the end (I plan to). It's mostly good and I agree with the point it's making. However, I think we need to flip it on its head. Fr
by avitzurel 8y ago
I did not read the article to the end (I plan to). It's mostly good and I agree with the point it's making.
However, I think we need to flip it on its head. From my point of view as an engineer, your pipeline doesn't really matter, no matter how smart and well thought out it is.
The weakest link in the pipeline is what isn't mentioned here, how do you get candidates into the pipeline.
I get 5-10 recruiting emails a week and about the same number of linked-in messages, none of them ever even come to a phone call. (and yes, I have gotten a few from Stripe as well).
How do you email/call/text candidates? How do you define them? Do you have the same email for all or you distinguish between levels?
A lof of companies have a good pipeline and they say "we don't do whiteboards" but their recruiters are doing a disgusting job at finding people, just absolutely shameful.
- selestify 8y agoIs that because you're not responding to the recruiting emails or they don't get back to you after you respond? How would you imorove that process?
- peterwwillis 8y agoOne idea would be standardized questionnaires. Rather than job sites being collections of buzzwords and tools, if they presented questionnaires that matched a variety of similar job titles, employers could simply fill out the questionnaire and be matched with candidates who answer similarly.