5 ms·
I think he means it would be expensive to inject randomness all the time instead of just letting a rule-based system go from state to state deterministically.
by joycian 8y ago
I think he means it would be expensive to inject randomness all the time instead of just letting a rule-based system go from state to state deterministically.
- mirimir 8y agoOK, except why are you putting it in those terms? It just is what it is. There's no reason to think that stuff evolves in the least-expensive way. And there are rules. What we call laws of physics. It's just that there's lots of wiggle room. At least, if you're lucky enough.