Are you sure you're on the right track? The least you can do is not make the same mistake that you're accusing other of. > How is your concept of intellectual

Are you sure you're on the right track? The least you can do is not make the same mistake that you're accusing other of. > How is your concept of intellectual property so divorced from reality? In what country does one make a promise not to hum a song to a rights holder in written form? This beggars belief that you are anything other than some uninformed radical. Fallacy: 1) Ad Hominem > As with all of intellectual property, unless you are attempting to commercialize your idea, you aren't going to be seriously targeted for using someone's intellectual property. Fallacy: Appeal to probability > I struggle to treat this post as anything but the uninformed ramblings of a true radical. I mean, could you at least pretend to have a real world understanding of intellectual property when you create your examples? Fallacy: Ad Hominem > Here's a question for you: Have you ever created anything in your life with value that could be protected by intellectual property laws (copyright, trademark, patent, etc)? Have you ever created anything of value and given it away? Or are these ruminations about intellectual property purely hypothetical? Fallacy: Ad Hominem You could have ended your post by pointing out the fallacies, but Internet has taught you to go a step further (Look at me doing the same thing)