Partially true .. > Open source doesn't mean open development and liability & commitments. Right. We are stating up-front what we intend to achieve. We will s

Partially true .. > Open source doesn't mean open development and liability & commitments. Right. We are stating up-front what we intend to achieve. We will sart with making WPF on .NET Core have parity with .NET Framework and then expand from there. We'll stick to Windows as the OS for the project. > The purpose is to literally make the source public but they don't have resources to make a long commitment. We are not saying that. We intend to continue working on WPF. In fact, we are talking about moving some of Microsoft's 1st-party apps to WPF on .NET Core, just like how we're moving 1st-party web sites/services to ASP.NET Core and .NET Core. Same playbook.