Its a bit of a loose tour of theories, but certainly not bullshit. I spot things I disagree with like the widely held idea that Einsteins physics rules out an "

Its a bit of a loose tour of theories, but certainly not bullshit. I spot things I disagree with like the widely held idea that Einsteins physics rules out an "absolute frame", the sense of that depends on a certain restriction of what absolute means in relation to a time/space frame. We are in a local time/space frame which is connected to and consistent with nearby and all connected frames. It is absolute in the sense that it is continuous, its just hard to visualize the 'superframe' which is the product of all the local frames. A satellite experiment successfully confirmed the Earths rotation causing our nearby frame to "shift", or rather rotate. Many would disagree with that contention of mine, the depth of my understanding, and language used - it surely could be improved and occasionally is by an experienced experts advice. Similarly, this article I think will be full of such potential disagreements and corrections but that doesnt mean its not a well written and valuable exploration of the extensive subject of meanings and perceptions of time.