Well I mean what's wrong with the study itself? If you think DDG might have biased the structure or even falsified results, fine - make that claim. But otherwi

Well I mean what's wrong with the study itself? If you think DDG might have biased the structure or even falsified results, fine - make that claim. But otherwise this shouldn't really matter. Otherwise we're going to go down a rabbit hole of arguing on subjective matters, like why trust DDG, rather than pointing out objectively what's wrong with the research.