It's not that I don't acknowledge that your emperor is wearing pasties, I just don't think they cover enough to be considered clothing. I think the onus is on

It's not that I don't acknowledge that your emperor is wearing pasties, I just don't think they cover enough to be considered clothing. I think the onus is on you, as the advocate of this clause, to name one actual patent troll case that would have been prevented by it. SCO wouldn't have been prevented. The recent Oracle action against Google would not have been prevented. So which one? You need to provide protection from actual, plausible danger to justify the doubt, uncertainty, and fear that you are keen to spread.