4 ms·
>Besides which, sustainable fires (i.e. ones which don't, in the long run, substantially change forest coverage or makeup) are by definition carbon neutral. No
by shower-curtain 8y ago
>Besides which, sustainable fires (i.e. ones which don't, in the long run, substantially change forest coverage or makeup) are by definition carbon neutral.
Not when the rate of fires exceeds the rate of regrowth due to climate change.
- admax88q 8y agoThe burnt forest will regrow, absorbing that CO2 back out of the atmosphere.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoYeah, that's kind of the definition of "non-sustainable."