> Firefox was already 'good enough' long before Only if you as "good enough" define "with Javascript even slower than IE." I've personally never used Chrome, b

> Firefox was already 'good enough' long before Only if you as "good enough" define "with Javascript even slower than IE." I've personally never used Chrome, because since even the first days it already had more "protected" installation than some malware, and that never made me confident in their intentions (and I've never liked Chrome UI) but Firefox has always had performance problems. As Chrome appeared it had extremely fast JS, and only then others "woke up."