4 ms·

Cars park in designated spots on streets, they are (generally) not randomly dropped onto sidewalks and parks. The issue for me is the co-opting of public space

Cars park in designated spots on streets, they are (generally) not randomly dropped onto sidewalks and parks. The issue for me is the co-opting of public space for private enterprise in the least considerate way possible. People leave these scooters like litter in parks, sidewalks, and lakes. You could object that this is an overly precious perspective, but I would counter that similar startups (ZipCar most notably) have solved this by contemplating the logistical implications from the get go. I personally would not object the assigning some percentage of parking spots in neighborhoods as designated parking for shares, and would hope such a contract will emerge. I certainly understand the dockless advantage here, but the result for those of us who don't use them is garbage some random company feels entitled to clutter up the sidewalks with.

dcosson 8y ago
Everything you said could apply equally well to cars. Especially "the result for those of us who don't use them is garbage some random company(and individuals) feels entitled to clutter up the sidewalks(streets) with". Also, what does private enterprises have to do with any of this? If anything I think there's a stronger argument the other way. Things that are owned by and only benefit a single person (e.g. driving my car and then leaving it parked on the street all day) is a worse use of space than things that are useful to many people (e.g. a Zipcar that gets frequent use, or, yes, scooters). I hope you can recognize that your stated arguments here are not very honest, and that what you're actually saying is "I like privately owned cars so I want cities to prioritize them over other modes of transportation like scooters".
lazyasciiart 8y ago
Why "some percentage"? I personally am ready to start "parking" my dockless shared bike in parking spots. I don't use cars, but I have to put up with them taking up a huge percentage of public space in my neighborhood.
icebraining 8y ago
Cars had to "disrupt" their way into getting a bunch of infrastructure built for them too; they weren't sitting in factories until streets were filled with parking spaces and traffic signs.
- kaybe 8y ago
  One of the strategies was to have officials take them and then be annoyed enough to change legislation. (eg there was a 3 km/h speed limit for the first car, then they went to fetch some officials from the train station with it. The legislation was changed very fast after that.)
CalRobert 8y ago
Cars stole that space from people walking, horses, carts, bicycles, donkeys, livestock, etc. For thousands of years it was normal for children to play in the street, for people to stop and converse, etc. Then drivers turned up, said "move or I will kill you", and weirdly we decided the streets were for cars. It grates when people say that people walking have any less right to stand in the middle of the street because they're not wearing a car. This was the result of a concerted PR campaign. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2012/04/invention-jaywalking/1837/ https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2012/04/invention-jay... Do the people look out of place here? http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/c/c/3/a/cc3a56fafeaa6119/Screen_Shot_2016-07-24_at_11.07.12_PM.png http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/c/c/3/a/cc3a56fafeaa6119/S... Perhaps we should take some space from cars (really, from people who happen to be in cars) and give it back to people.

dcosson 8y ago

Everything you said could apply equally well to cars. Especially "the result for those of us who don't use them is garbage some random company(and individuals) feels entitled to clutter up the sidewalks(streets) with". Also, what does private enterprises have to do with any of this? If anything I think there's a stronger argument the other way. Things that are owned by and only benefit a single person (e.g. driving my car and then leaving it parked on the street all day) is a worse use of space than things that are useful to many people (e.g. a Zipcar that gets frequent use, or, yes, scooters). I hope you can recognize that your stated arguments here are not very honest, and that what you're actually saying is "I like privately owned cars so I want cities to prioritize them over other modes of transportation like scooters".

lazyasciiart 8y ago

Why "some percentage"? I personally am ready to start "parking" my dockless shared bike in parking spots. I don't use cars, but I have to put up with them taking up a huge percentage of public space in my neighborhood.

icebraining 8y ago

Cars had to "disrupt" their way into getting a bunch of infrastructure built for them too; they weren't sitting in factories until streets were filled with parking spaces and traffic signs.

kaybe 8y ago
One of the strategies was to have officials take them and then be annoyed enough to change legislation. (eg there was a 3 km/h speed limit for the first car, then they went to fetch some officials from the train station with it. The legislation was changed very fast after that.)

CalRobert 8y ago

Cars stole that space from people walking, horses, carts, bicycles, donkeys, livestock, etc. For thousands of years it was normal for children to play in the street, for people to stop and converse, etc. Then drivers turned up, said "move or I will kill you", and weirdly we decided the streets were for cars. It grates when people say that people walking have any less right to stand in the middle of the street because they're not wearing a car. This was the result of a concerted PR campaign. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2012/04/invention-jaywalking/1837/ https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2012/04/invention-jay... Do the people look out of place here? http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/c/c/3/a/cc3a56fafeaa6119/Screen_Shot_2016-07-24_at_11.07.12_PM.png http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/c/c/3/a/cc3a56fafeaa6119/S... Perhaps we should take some space from cars (really, from people who happen to be in cars) and give it back to people.