I'm sure you were attempting to make a point, but you failed. But if you are trying to claim that R.A. Fisher only cared claims that statistics is only about in

I'm sure you were attempting to make a point, but you failed. But if you are trying to claim that R.A. Fisher only cared claims that statistics is only about inference, the point is moot because: 1. R.A. Fisher isn't the Almighty Statistical God just because he did laid a lot of foundations in early statistics. 2. Fisher has a long history of seriously stupid personal-beliefs including but not limited to: refuting anything and everything relating to Bayesian statistics, attempting to discredit the studies done showing a link between smoking and lung cancer, and advocating for eugenics and the idea of superiority/inferiority between races. So just because Fisher may have claimed something doesn't make it so.