4 ms·
its a bit of a slippery slope though isnt it? look at gab getting their domain and cloud hosting dropped... censorship is moving down the stack. why wouldn't i
by billylindeman 8y ago
its a bit of a slippery slope though isnt it?
look at gab getting their domain and cloud hosting dropped... censorship is moving down the stack. why wouldn't it hit the IX's?
- camjohnson26 8y agoYou have a right to free speech, not a right for other people to repeat it.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- stale2002 8y agoI mean, ok, just don't come crying to everyone else about "net neutrality" when large megacorps start censoring competing services and putting your streaming traffic in the internet slow lane. I mean, it is their service,right?
- Townley 8y agoThat's the whole point behind Title II. No, it's not their service: it's a common carrier providing a public utility. With that comes responsibilities towards consistency and neutrality of service.
- snek 8y agoOnce you hit the IX level you reach the ethical question of should the internet inherently be an equal platform regardless of content. this involves child pornography, terrorism, etc. very very bad things. My personal stance (as I said above) is that an IX shouldn't discriminate traffic. An ISP downstream could block cp and terrorism and whatnot, by the law of the country they operate in, their own ethical beliefs, or whatever. I would also argue that google shouldn't discriminate content, but that is its own slippery slope. Here in the US, Google blocks sites in DMCA disputes, sites in FBI takedown disputes, etc.