Quick question. If one group intends a grossly inadequate effort to be a layer of security and another party ignores that effort who is in error? It could be ar

Quick question. If one group intends a grossly inadequate effort to be a layer of security and another party ignores that effort who is in error? It could be argued that if the supposed security measure is so poorly conceived the bypassing party presumed it to be an error and thus used their software knowledge to mitigate the defect. On one hand there is an intentional barrier to restrict access to content while on the other hand the intention is to serve content and so the bypassing party assists that service intention. I am of the bias that a space of technology cannot be summarily redefined by a single group interest merely to compensate their financial insecurity.