There's a quote from one professor who's specialty seems to be sustainable energy, not agriculture. The mine owners "considering" this idea is about as non-comm

There's a quote from one professor who's specialty seems to be sustainable energy, not agriculture. The mine owners "considering" this idea is about as non-commital as you can get. I occasionally feel the same frustration you do with the naysaying here, but I'm even more frustrated by the hand-waving that accompanies some of the innovations presented here. The naysayers were right about Theranos and Juicero, there's a possibility that they could be right about this idea (or on any other topic) as well. The article mentions only upsides and opportunities. Not a single downside is mentioned, no risks are addressed. Either there are no downsides, or the article is one-sided, in which case we should appreciate the additional context and information provided by the "naysayers" here.