4 ms·
> Plus you have no right to want anything more. Some of the linked wallpapers do not have their source files linked. As far as I know the GPL requires that the
by josefx 8y ago
> Plus you have no right to want anything more.
Some of the linked wallpapers do not have their source files linked. As far as I know the GPL requires that the preferred version of the source is also made available and neither png nor jpeg qualify for most image manipulation tools. At least a few have the xcf also linked.
- klez 8y agoWhy do you think they're GPL-licenced? Did I miss the license on the page? Also, if you read about the FSF they don't advocate for all non-software to be free. Some documentation from the FSF is not included in Debian because the Debian developers deemed it not free enough, because some parts are marked as non-modifiable.
- josefx 8y agoAt least this one is https://www.gnu.org/graphics/this-is-freedom-wallpaper.html https://www.gnu.org/graphics/this-is-freedom-wallpaper.html , stated below the image. However that brings up annother issue, which license applies to the images that do not have an explicit license stated? Is it the creative commons stated for the website itself and would this also apply to the externally hosted images?
- klez 8y agoI guess the CC license is just for the page, as the image are hosted someplace else and are not explicitly included in the license footer (which is the standard footer throughout the FSF/GNU website.) If the images themselves don't specify any license they fall back to "all rights reserved".