4 ms·

Unfortunately they will just feel up to your nuts/vag instead of looking at them. I agree with the sentiment.

by eof 16y ago

thangalin 16y ago
Such an action is unacceptable. Section eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states, "Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure." The U.S. Constitution - Amendment 4 states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Personally invasive searches are unreasonable when travelling by foot, by car, by boat, by bicycle, and, I contend, by aeroplane. If society agrees that it is unreasonable to be virtually strip-searched or intimately groped while travelling by plane, then the TSA is violating a fundamental right of North American society.
- secos 16y ago
  They won't though. You are asking people to choose between getting groped/irradiated and BIG SCARY AMBIGUOUS THREAT. Most people are not willing/able to make the leap you have.
  - eof 16y ago
    It's true that most people aren't willing, however that doesn't really mean people shouldn't be encouraging them to anyway. Your post reminds me of people who try to convince me that trying to convince people to vote for a third party is dumb/ a waste of time/pointless since most people won't do it. At this point it's going to take nothing short of a revolution to have a world where leadership, in addition to technology, is actually beneficial to the masses, at this point it's essentially a parasitic relationship. So as far as I can tell, rather people start getting fed up sooner rather than later.
- eof 16y ago
  Yeah, it's unacceptable.. but are you just going to buy a ticket on Nov 15 and let your seat stay empty? Or are you going to let them do something unacceptable to you?
- willheim 16y ago
  Define "unacceptable". I much prefer flying in Canada (or anywhere else) as opposed to flying anywhere in the US. I've found the whole process post 9/11 to be unacceptable, disrespectful, uncomfortable, tedious, and just plain unpleasant. The only people I feel more sorry for are those who work in the airports because they have to deal with regulations and procedures that create hostile attitudes amongst the cattle (erm, I meant passengers) and they have to become desensitized to the whole malarkey on the off chance that a bottle of breast milk might be some liquid explosive.

Unfortunately they will just feel up to your nuts/vag instead of looking at them. I agree with the sentiment.

by eof 16y ago

Unfortunately they will just feel up to your nuts/vag instead of looking at them. I agree with the sentiment.

Such an action is unacceptable. Section eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states, "Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure." The U.S. Constitution - Amendment 4 states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Personally invasive searches are unreasonable when travelling by foot, by car, by boat, by bicycle, and, I contend, by aeroplane. If society agrees that it is unreasonable to be virtually strip-searched or intimately groped while travelling by plane, then the TSA is violating a fundamental right of North American society.

secos 16y ago
They won't though. You are asking people to choose between getting groped/irradiated and BIG SCARY AMBIGUOUS THREAT. Most people are not willing/able to make the leap you have.
- eof 16y ago
  It's true that most people aren't willing, however that doesn't really mean people shouldn't be encouraging them to anyway. Your post reminds me of people who try to convince me that trying to convince people to vote for a third party is dumb/ a waste of time/pointless since most people won't do it. At this point it's going to take nothing short of a revolution to have a world where leadership, in addition to technology, is actually beneficial to the masses, at this point it's essentially a parasitic relationship. So as far as I can tell, rather people start getting fed up sooner rather than later.
eof 16y ago
Yeah, it's unacceptable.. but are you just going to buy a ticket on Nov 15 and let your seat stay empty? Or are you going to let them do something unacceptable to you?
willheim 16y ago
Define "unacceptable". I much prefer flying in Canada (or anywhere else) as opposed to flying anywhere in the US. I've found the whole process post 9/11 to be unacceptable, disrespectful, uncomfortable, tedious, and just plain unpleasant. The only people I feel more sorry for are those who work in the airports because they have to deal with regulations and procedures that create hostile attitudes amongst the cattle (erm, I meant passengers) and they have to become desensitized to the whole malarkey on the off chance that a bottle of breast milk might be some liquid explosive.