I see you making this complaint, and I'm interested to know more about your thinking. I also pay for journalism, to selected publications. I couldn't afford to

I see you making this complaint, and I'm interested to know more about your thinking. I also pay for journalism, to selected publications. I couldn't afford to buy a subscription to all the publications on which I read just a handful of articles a month, but most of them allow you to read a handful of articles without a subscription. The WSJ is the exception here. My question to you: would you expect all HN readers who want to read submitted WSJ articles to purchase a WSJ subscription - along with subscriptions to all the other paywalled publications posted here? Given that few will be able to justify the cost of that, do you think WSJ should be banned from HN?