4 ms·

Thanks tgrass. 1. Great point. I will replace them. 2. I need to rework that image. 3. Good to learn about "Risk Free". I had no idea. 4. I never looked at

Thanks tgrass. 1. Great point. I will replace them. 2. I need to rework that image. 3. Good to learn about "Risk Free". I had no idea. 4. I never looked at it from that angle. What do you suggest I say / show as far as "Who are the ladies?" is concerned? Or do I even bother? I simply wanted to share the fact that there are real "ladies" involved with the site who will be responding. 5. At this point I do not have any filters set to incentivize the right ladies. Every question asked gets emailed out to all the ladies and I simply ask them to respond only if they can relate to the question. As the user base grows I can certainly allow the "Asker" to target by demographics, etc. => Any input on price structure and scalability? Thanks again. Appreciate your input.

tgrass 16y ago
Re: 4. I would show profiles. Let the females write their profiles and showcase say a half dozen at a time. Additionally, I wouldn't call them "the ladies." It seems to cheapen them. If you're selling a more machismo site, see what Maxim is calling women in general these days. Realize that whatever label you use must appeal to both the men but also the women. Maybe be euphemistic, but not as vulgar as nuts and bolts. Your prices seem reasonable. You might consider having a level which is free, receiving an answer from a newbie, where a higher paid level could get a more thoughtful reply. That would allow new users to experience without commitment. I really want to stress that the idea looks good. The aesthetic execution is rough.