> Should the 49.9901 get ruled by the other side? Oooh, there's another favorite argument of anti-democrats. Curiously, they have no problem whatsoever with 55

> Should the 49.9901 get ruled by the other side? Oooh, there's another favorite argument of anti-democrats. Curiously, they have no problem whatsoever with 55% of the population being ruled by 45% under gerrymandered elections, or a winning candidate disenfranchising tens of thousands of voters. > Again, unless you require a supermajority for all votes, direct democracy is easily swayed by political hacks like Colbert or Catiline. While presidential democracy leads to the election of sober statesmen like [checks notes...] Trump?