3 ms·
> Oh please. This is so far from an actual concern that I struggle to summon the energy to even shrug about it. I guess it should say, "locally". I don't disag
by justinator 8y ago
> Oh please. This is so far from an actual concern that I struggle to summon the energy to even shrug about it.
I guess it should say, "locally". I don't disagree there's far worse things damaging the ecosystems of the world, but if there's a trail, and people keep hiking off trail to make rock stacks, that area will get damaged, locally.
It's like if someone built a path through your backyard. Great, there's a path you don't want, used by people you don't want in your back yard. But everyone likes it, as it provides a nice shortcut. Are the local authorities to shrug and say, "well, there's worse things", and cite its popularity, then point to your car? Or, should something be done?
- downer59 8y agoYes. Yes they will. They will shrug. The local authorities will shrug at you. All the time. They will tell you to deal with it, and pay for your own fence. In fact, they'd be more likely to intervene, if you build a fence that's too big. A fence made out of stones, even. Stacking too many stones to make an excessively large fence, to prevent people from stacking stones. Imagine.
- notacoward 8y agoIn the real world, police enforce trespass laws all the time. It's far better than having to deal with the fallout after a direct confrontation between trespassers and property owners, in most cases.
- downer59 8y agoThe results are actually mixed and varied. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=skateboarders+versus+property+owners https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=skateboarders+v...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- notacoward 8y agoIndeed they are. Which is why "will shrug at you all the time" was untrue.