3 ms·
This article written by a non-expert. The cost of genome sequencing has been relatively flat in the last couple of years; and Illumina, being the monopoly, has
by dkural 8y ago
This article written by a non-expert. The cost of genome sequencing has been relatively flat in the last couple of years; and Illumina, being the monopoly, has no incentives to reduce the cost of sequencing. Also; despite what some commenters seem to think, it doesn't get to keep the data people sequence on its devices, any more than your printer company owns the content of what you print.
One would likely get sequenced many times over a lifetime - a so-called "liquid biopsy", meaning sequencing circulating DNA & tumor cells in your blood, can catch aberrant cancer-related mutations earlier and help predict cancer / catch it earlier. Once this is mature, people will likely take this test every 5 years etc.
- new299 8y agoI think the BGI/MGI will probably provide an incentive. Recent reports suggest that their instruments are starting to produce reasonable data (80% > Q30). Illumina have ~90% [1] markup on consumables. They can afford to reduce their price to $100 per genome (and have said they will). With the pressure applied by the BGI I can certainly see this happening. [1] http://41j.com/blog/2018/11/illumina-consumables-are-90-profit/ http://41j.com/blog/2018/11/illumina-consumables-are-90-prof...