4 ms·
I don’t see how you interpreted it that way - anything released with a proprietary license, or closed source and not released at all, is proprietary. The fact t
by jf- 8y ago
I don’t see how you interpreted it that way - anything released with a proprietary license, or closed source and not released at all, is proprietary. The fact that it’s derivative of an MIT or similarly licensed work makes no difference.
- SquishyPanda23 8y agoYes, sorry, I thought you were giving it a normative interpretation, but you were just stating a fact. I agree that your statement is correct.