4 ms·

As always, seems to be full of right-wing anti-semitism, fake news and outlandish conservative conspiracy theories. Just check the 'popular' tab: "Welcome to "Y

by orf 8y ago

As always, seems to be full of right-wing anti-semitism, fake news and outlandish conservative conspiracy theories. Just check the 'popular' tab: "Welcome to "Your" Zionist Occupied Government", "EXPOSED: Jewish Donors Granted "Access To NYPD HQ", "How the Globalists Stole Our Home". All uploaded within the last hour. - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/white-genocide/ https://www.bitchute.com/channel/white-genocide/ - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/zionistreport/ https://www.bitchute.com/channel/zionistreport/ - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wayoftheworld/ https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wayoftheworld/

justAnotherNET 8y ago
It's kind of funny, but your position (and other experiences with uncensored platforms) suggests that left wing ideas can only prosper when supported by censorship and thought supression.
userbinator 8y ago
Any service that strongly supports free speech will naturally attract the extremists which have been displaced from elsewhere. Right or left doesn't matter, it's just the result of the current political climate.
- TheForumTroll 8y ago
  Then the right should have no need to use the service?
- spookthesunset 8y ago
  > It's just the result of the current political climate. It has nothing to do with the "political climate". It has everything to do with the fact most people don't want to listen nut-jobs all day. In fact, in a free market it would appear people seem to prefer platforms that banish the nut jobs.
  - dreta 8y ago
    it has everything to do with the current political climate, and the fact that extremist views on one side are tolerated, while ones on the other are actively being fought against if you don't want to listen to "nut jobs", you don't have to, nobody's shoving Alex Jones in your face, but banning people you find objectionable sets up a dangerous precedent
    - spookthesunset 8y ago
      I'm sorry you feel that way but maybe the invisible hand of the free market has decided that it just isn't profitable for large companies to provide platforms for people like Alex Jones. You should be happy to live in a world where a business is allowed to make decisions that act in their rational best interest instead of being forced by government to do something that doesn't make sense to their bottom line. Maybe Mr. Jones can build his own content distribution channels? If he can't, maybe his ideas just aren't that popular and his business should fail? And for what it's worth, Alex Jones supporters spread like a cancer through sites that allow it. The community surrounding him and those like him are often more toxic then the founders.
cannedslime 8y ago
> "Welcome to "Your" Zionist Occupied Government" What is AIPAC?
buboard 8y ago
what did you expect , travel vlogs? i believe youtube has cornered that market. Or are you suggesting that bitchute specifically excludes other kinds of content?
Chris_Chambers 8y ago
Platforms are not responsible for user-generated content any more than your phone company is responsible for what you personally say during calls.

by orf 8y ago

justAnotherNET 8y ago

It's kind of funny, but your position (and other experiences with uncensored platforms) suggests that left wing ideas can only prosper when supported by censorship and thought supression.

userbinator 8y ago

Any service that strongly supports free speech will naturally attract the extremists which have been displaced from elsewhere. Right or left doesn't matter, it's just the result of the current political climate.

TheForumTroll 8y ago
Then the right should have no need to use the service?
spookthesunset 8y ago
> It's just the result of the current political climate. It has nothing to do with the "political climate". It has everything to do with the fact most people don't want to listen nut-jobs all day. In fact, in a free market it would appear people seem to prefer platforms that banish the nut jobs.
- dreta 8y ago
  it has everything to do with the current political climate, and the fact that extremist views on one side are tolerated, while ones on the other are actively being fought against if you don't want to listen to "nut jobs", you don't have to, nobody's shoving Alex Jones in your face, but banning people you find objectionable sets up a dangerous precedent
  - spookthesunset 8y ago
    I'm sorry you feel that way but maybe the invisible hand of the free market has decided that it just isn't profitable for large companies to provide platforms for people like Alex Jones. You should be happy to live in a world where a business is allowed to make decisions that act in their rational best interest instead of being forced by government to do something that doesn't make sense to their bottom line. Maybe Mr. Jones can build his own content distribution channels? If he can't, maybe his ideas just aren't that popular and his business should fail? And for what it's worth, Alex Jones supporters spread like a cancer through sites that allow it. The community surrounding him and those like him are often more toxic then the founders.

cannedslime 8y ago

> "Welcome to "Your" Zionist Occupied Government" What is AIPAC?

buboard 8y ago

what did you expect , travel vlogs? i believe youtube has cornered that market. Or are you suggesting that bitchute specifically excludes other kinds of content?

Chris_Chambers 8y ago

Platforms are not responsible for user-generated content any more than your phone company is responsible for what you personally say during calls.