4 ms·
The argument goes something like: there are outbreaks in populations with very high immunization levels, so they're not even effective! Or they're only effectiv
by purplethinking 8y ago
The argument goes something like: there are outbreaks in populations with very high immunization levels, so they're not even effective! Or they're only effective for a time and only partially, so it's not worth the risk.
- emerongi 8y agoInteresting that in a way this might be a self-feeding cycle. People stop vaccinating, suddenly there are outbreaks in high-vaccination areas (really just smaller groups of people that do not vaccinate?), which then gets used as an argument against vaccinations. To me, the effectiveness is the single most obvious argument for vaccinations. If that can't convince someone, maybe nothing can't.