3 ms·
That's assuming that laws are the perfect arbiter of what is useful and what is not. Some useful and moral activities are or used to be criminal acts.
by the8472 8y ago
That's assuming that laws are the perfect arbiter of what is useful and what is not. Some useful and moral activities are or used to be criminal acts.
- Veen 8y agoHow is that remotely relevant to the topic under discussion? I mean, it's true that laws are sometimes unethical or mistaken. But that has nothing to do with whether journalism is useful and worth protecting.
- Koshkin 8y agoThe purpose of the law is not to determine what is useful and what isn’t. People can decide that for themselves.