3 ms·
> Science is no longer interested in explanations, correlation is enough to assume causal "contribution." Cite? Some journalism about science, perhaps, but yo
by michaelcampbell 8y ago
> Science is no longer interested in explanations, correlation is enough to assume causal "contribution."
Cite? Some journalism about science, perhaps, but your brush is broad enough to be absurd at best.
- imron 8y agoScience has a significant reproducibility problem. Maybe it's a bit much to say it's no longer interested in explanations, but there's a lot of bad science being published.