4 ms·
Well, for one thing, it would make a takedown request like this impossible to enforce.
by dooglius 8y ago
Well, for one thing, it would make a takedown request like this impossible to enforce.
- betterunix2 8y agoNo, it would mean that the takedown request is satisfied by the Mozilla revoking signatures on the addons, something which the signer can always do (e.g. at a minimum they can push a new signature key and re-sign all the other addons).
- dooglius 8y agoGood point. Is there any legal precedent (in the US) for forcing signature revocation though? It seems to run up against the first amendment since Mozilla would essentially be making a statement that "the addon with hash 1234 does not contain malware", which should be legally protected speech.