3 ms·
In the mean time I'm a happy nilfs2 user (not so happy for the cleaner performance but in the end it works) down from the root. A logfs is really nice against a
by xte 8y ago
In the mean time I'm a happy nilfs2 user (not so happy for the cleaner performance but in the end it works) down from the root. A logfs is really nice against accidental overwrite/delection and coupled with LUKS+LVM while far from zfs comfort and perhaps future bcachefs it can work with enough flexibility (nilfs2 can resize both in grow and shrink direction live and IME issueless).
GNU/Linux desperately need a modern storage solution, well ANY OS I know of except DragonflyBSD (Hammer) do need it.
- shmerl 8y agoOpenZFS is available, if you need something right now. Though it's not convenient to use for normal desktop systems (something like Partition Manager and Gparted don't support it).
- xte 8y agoI have used it both FreeBSD port and LLNL port but for now on GNU/Linux IMO it's better LUKS+LVM+nilfs2 for stability and performance...