3 ms·
I wasn't thinking about the question of a creator, per se. I was thinking generally about the fallacy of seeking intentionality in evolution. There is a point
by mirimir 8y ago
I wasn't thinking about the question of a creator, per se.
I was thinking generally about the fallacy of seeking intentionality in evolution. There is a point to analyzing what happened, of course. It's just that too much "why" is dangerous.
- otabdeveloper2 8y ago> It's just that too much "why" is dangerous. You're totally right. Asking questions and thinking about things might lead you to dangerous places. You might even (gasp) eventually start believing in God. That would be doubleplus ungood crimethink!
- icebraining 8y agoAh, but which one? You might start believing in the wrong god.
- mirimir 8y agoI'm a fundamentalist. To the extent that I consider the possibility of deities, it's the fundamental active/aggressive and passive/receptive principles that appeal most. Plus some casual animism, I guess. Although I've always been agnostic, experience with psychedelics has affected me. Plus, of course, all the fantasy and SF.
- stallmanite 8y agoah yes religion, bastion of total intellectual freedom
- mac01021 8y agoI did not down vote you. Why ("how come")? Is a legitimate question, though. What selective pressure is there in the environment that would lead to dumber octopuses dying off while smarter ones thrive?